4.6 Article

Thermodynamic stability of non-stoichiometric SrFeO3-: a hybrid DFT study

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 3918-3931

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8cp07117a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Physical Chemistry of the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research
  2. Latvian Council for Science [lzp-2018/1-0147]
  3. Stuttgart Supercomputing Centre [DEFTD 12939]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SrFeO3- is a mixed ionic-electronic conductor with a complex magnetic structure that reveals a colossal magnetoresistance effect. This material and its solid solutions are attractive for various spintronic, catalytic and electrochemical applications, including cathodes for solid oxide fuel cells and permeation membranes. Its properties strongly depend on oxygen non-stoichiometry. Ab initio hybrid functional approach was applied herein to study the thermodynamic stability of a series of SrFeO3- compositions with several non-stoichiometries , ranging from 0 to 0.5 (SrFeO3-SrFeO2.875-SrFeO2.75-SrFeO2.5) as a function of temperature and oxygen pressure. The results obtained by two approaches, in which either (i) all electrons at Fe atoms explicitly described or (ii) inner core electrons at Fe atoms are replaced by effective core potential, are compared. Based on our calculations, phase diagrams were constructed, allowing the determination of environmental conditions for the existence of stable phases. It is shown that (within an employed model) only the SrFeO2.5 phase appears to be stable. The stability region for this phase was re-drawn on the contour map of oxygen chemical potential, presented as a function of temperature and oxygen partial pressure. A similar analysis was also performed using experimental Gibbs energies of perovskite formation from the elements. The present modelling strongly suggest a significant attraction between neutral oxygen vacancies. These vacancies are created during a series of the abovementioned SrFeO3- mutual transformations accompanied by oxygen release.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据