4.6 Article

A metal-organic framework with suitable pore size and dual functionalities for highly efficient post-combustion CO2 capture

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 3128-3134

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta11596f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Welch Foundation [AX-1730]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672248, 51872261]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY19B010004, LR19E020002]
  4. Qianjiang Talent plan of Zhejiang Province [QJD1802018]
  5. Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP) at KSU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) from flue gases with porous materials has been considered as a viable alternative technology to replace traditional liquid amine adsorbents. A large number of microporous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been developed as CO2-capturing materials. However, it is challenging to target materials with both extremely high CO2 capture capacity and gas selectivity (socalled trade-off) along with moderate regeneration energy. Herein, we developed a novel porous material, [Cu(dpt)(2)(SiF6)](n) (termed as UTSA-120; dpt = 3,6-di(4-pyridyl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine), which is isoreticular to the net of SIFSIX-2-Cu-i. This material exhibits simultaneously high CO2 capture capacity (3.56 mmol g(-1) at 0.15 bar and 296 K) and CO2/N-2 selectivity (similar to 600), both of which are superior to those of SIFSIX-2-Cu-i and most other MOFs reported. Neutron powder diffraction experiments reveal that the exceptional CO2 capture capacity at the low-pressure region and the moderate heat of CO2 adsorption can be attributed to the suitable pore size and dual functionalities (SiF6(2-) and tetrazine), which not only interact with CO2 molecules but also enable the dense packing of CO2 molecules within the framework. Simulated and actual breakthrough experiments demonstrate that UTSA-120a can efficiently capture CO2 gas from the CO2/N-2 (15/85, v/v) and CO2/CH4 (50/50) gas mixtures under ambient conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据