4.7 Article

Preconcentration and speciation of chromium species using ICP-OES after ultrasound-assisted magnetic solid phase extraction with an amino-modified magnetic nanocomposite prepared from Fe3O4, MnO2 and Al2O3

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 184, 期 4, 页码 1223-1232

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-017-2126-2

关键词

Water analysis; Pareto chart; Microextraction; Response surface methodology; Transmission electron microscopy; Scanning electron microscopy; X-ray diffraction; Vibrating sample magnetometer; Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; Brunauer, Emmett and Teller

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST, South Africa) / National Nanoscience Postgraduate Teaching and Training Programme (NNPTTP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article describes a method for preconcentration and speciation of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in river waters. It is based on ultrasound-assisted magnetic solid phase extraction employing a nanocomposite prepared from magnetite nanoparticles, manganese oxide and alumina oxide, and then functionalized with [3-(2-aminoethylamino)propyl] trimethoxysilane (AAPTMS). By taking advantage of the oxidative properties of MnO2, the Fe3O4@MnO2,Al2O3 nanocomposite was used for the preconcentration of total chromium. The AAPTMS-modified nanocomposite, in turn, is selective for Cr(VI). The concentration of Cr(III) can be calculated as the difference between total chromium and Cr(VI). The preconcentrated chromium species were quantified using ICP-OES. The method was optimized using response surface methodology. Under optimal conditions, the limit of detection and quantification are 20 and 50 pg ai... mL(-1), respectively. The intraday and interday precisions of the method, expressed in terms of relative standard deviation, are 2.6 and 4.9%, respectively. In addition, the effects of potentially interfering ions were examined. The method was successfully applied to the speciation of chromium in spiked river water and a certified reference material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据