4.7 Article

Duplex voltammetric immunoassay for the cancer biomarkers carcinoembryonic antigen and alpha-fetoprotein by using metal-organic framework probes and a glassy carbon electrode modified with thiolated polyaniline nanofibers

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 184, 期 10, 页码 4037-4045

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-017-2437-3

关键词

Biosensor; Simultaneous determination; CEA; AFP; Metal-organic framework; Anodic stripping voltammetry; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; Cyclic voltammetry; Differential pulse voltammetry

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21575080, 21275091, 21175084]
  2. National Research Foundation for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120131110009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes stable and highly dispersed aqueous colloids of polyaniline (PANI) nanofibers that were prepared by a chemical method and used to modify a glassy carbon electrode (GCE). The materials combines the good electrical conductivity and network structure of PANI nanofibers with the complexing capacity of mercaptosuccinic acid. The modified GCEs exhibit high sensitivity to Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions, with detection limits of 50 ng.L-1 and 200 ng.L(-)1, respectively. The modified GCE was applied to the simultaneous determination of the cancer biomarkers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) by using particles of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) prepared from Pb(II) or Cd(I I) and 2-aminoterephthalic acid. The particles are used as electrochemical labels for secondary anti-CEA and secondary anti-AFP antibody in a sandwich assay. The two ions in the MOFs labels on the secondary antibody can be detected best at voltages of -0.63 and -0.88 V (vs Ag/AgCl), respectively. The assay has a linear response in the 0.3 pg.mL(-1) to 3 ng.mL(-1) concentration range of both CEA and AFP, and the respective detection limits are 0.03 pg.mL(-1) and 0.1 pg.mL(-1). In our preception, this assay has a wide scope in that it may be applied to a variety of sandwich types of immunoassays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据