4.7 Article

Graphene oxide wrapped Fe3O4@Au nanostructures as substrates for aptamer-based detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 184, 期 8, 页码 2653-2660

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-017-2298-9

关键词

Pathogenic bacteria; Magnetic separation; Gold nanoparticles; Salmon; Food safety

资金

  1. natural science foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20140155]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province [BE2016306]
  3. National Natural Science Fund of China [NSFC 31401575, 31401576]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016 T90430]
  5. Collaborative innovation center of food safety and quality control in Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors describe a sensitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based aptasensor for the detection of the food pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Nanostructures consisting of Fe3O4@ Au particles wrapped with graphene oxide (GO) were used both as SERS substrates and separation tools. A first aptamer (apt 1) was immobilized on the Fe3O4@ Au/GOnanostructures to act as a capture probe via the affinity binding of aptamer and V. parahaemolyticus. A second aptamer (apt-2) was modified with the Raman reporter molecule TAMRA to act as a SERS sensing probes that binds to the target the same way as the Fe3O4@ Au/GO-apt 1. The sandwich formed between Fe3O4@ Au/GO-apt 1/V. parahaemolyticus and apt 2-TAMRA can be separated with the aid of a magnet. The concentration of V. parahaemolyticus can be quantified by measurement of the SERS intensity of TAMRA. Under optimal conditions, the signal is linearly related to the V. parahaemolyticus concentration in the range between 1.4 x 10(2) to 1.4 x 10(6) cfu.mL(-1), with a detection limit of 14 cfu.mL(-1). Recoveries ranging from 98.5% to 105% are found when analyzing spiked salmon samples. In our perception, the assay described here is a useful tool for quantitation of V. parahaemolyticus in real samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据