4.7 Article

In-situ amplified voltammetric immunoassay for ochratoxin A by coupling a platinum nanocatalyst based enhancement to a redox cycling process promoted by an enzyme mimic

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 184, 期 7, 页码 2445-2453

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-017-2223-2

关键词

Ochratoxin A; Competitive immunosensor; Ferrocene; Enzyme mimic; Cyclic voltammetry; Foodsafety; AuPtnanoparticles; Platinum enhanced process; Redox cycling; Catalytic strategy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21505060]
  2. Foundation of Jiangxi Educational Committee [GJJ150327]
  3. Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20161BAB213073]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Jiangxi Normal University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new signal amplified protocol for sensitive monitor of ochratoxin A was developed by coupling platinum enhancement technique to a redox cycling amplification strategy. Initially, platinum-enclosed gold cores (AuPtNP) were functionalized with monoconal antibody against ochratoxin A (OTA) to act as signal tags. Upon addition of analyte (OTA), competitive immunobinding occurs between OTA and an OTA-BSA conjugate immobilized on a ferrocene modified electrode for the anti-OTA on the signal tags. Next, the AuPtNPs on the immunosensor are incubated with a platinum enhancing solution to initiate the growth of additional catalysts in order to further promote the catalytic cycling between p-aminophenol and p-quinoneimine with the aid of the reductant NaBH4 and ferrocene. As a result, the analytical signal is strongly enhanced and can be measured by differential pulse voltammetry in the range from -300 mV to 600 mV (vs. SCE) at 50 mV s(-1). Under optimized conditions, the immunosensor displays a dynamic working range that extends from 0.2 pgai...mL(-1) to 5 ngai...mL(-1) of OTA, with a lower detection limit of 75 fgai...mL(-1). The method is highly selective and was applied to the determination of OTA in (spiked) red wine samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据