4.0 Article

Improved prognosis of low baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is significantly exclusive in breast cancer patients with high absolute counts of lymphocytes

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 275-284

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1783

关键词

breast cancer; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; absolute lymphocyte count; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [15K10077]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K10077] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a valuable prognostic factor for early breast cancer, the patient subgroups that may benefit the most from NLR analysis remain unknown. The present study analyzed the prognostic significance of NLR according to absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs). A total of 889 patients with operated early breast cancers were retrospectively recruited. Existing NLR and ALC baseline data from the time-period prior to operation or preoperative chemotherapy were collected. The cut-off value for NLR was set at 2.72 according to the receiver operating characteristic curve. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) of NLR-low patients at baseline (n=582) was significantly better than that of NLR-high patients (n=307, P=0.036). Improved patient prognoses were observed in the NLR-low, ALC-high (>1,688/mu l; 5-year RFS, 0.88 vs. 0.57; P<0.0001) subgroup (n=355), but not in the NLR-low, ALC-low (<= 1,688/mu l; 5-year RFS, 0.87 vs. 0.87; P=0.46) subgroup (n=534). Using multivariate analysis, NLR was observed to be a significant and independent factor for RFS (hazard ratio: 3.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.61-7.32; P=0.0023) in the ALC-high breast cancer subgroup. Prognostic significance for baseline NLR was found exclusively in the ALC - high subgroup. Since NLR is a simple marker, the results obtained here might be useful for identifying patients who have high recurrence risk, and those that are candidates for additional treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据