4.7 Article

Complex samples and spectral interferences in ICP-MS: Evaluation of tandem mass spectrometry for interference-free determination of cadmium, tin and platinum group elements

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 130, 期 -, 页码 271-275

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2016.09.011

关键词

Spectral interferences; Tandem mass spectrometry; Mass shift mode; On mass mode; Platinum-group metals

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2013/26672-5, 2015/14488-0]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [15/2014]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [307639/2014-2, 303107/2013-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An analytical method was developed for determination of Cd, Sn, Pd, Pt and Rh in sediments; fertilizer and sludge samples by inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry (ICP-MS/MS). The performance of ICP-MS/MS using oxygen into the octopole reaction system (ORS3) and MS/MS mode, on mass and shift mass, was evaluated to overcome spectral interferences. Addition and recovery experiments in sediments, fertilizer and sludge samples at three concentration levels, 0.5, 1.0 and 5.0 mu g L-1, were carried out to evaluate the accuracy of the developed procedure. Quantitative recoveries, from 80 to 113% for Cd-112(+), Sn-120(+) and Pd-106(+) were reached using MS/MS in on mass operation mode. For Pt and Rh, recoveries ranged from 81 to 117% by monitoring (PtO+)-Pt-195-O-16 and (RhO+)-Rh-103-O-16 in MS/MS (shift mass mode) with 0.3 mL min(-1) oxygen gas flow rate pressurized into the ORS3. Limits of detection of the developed method were 15, 2.5, 1.8, 9.0 and 9.9 mu g kg(-1) for (RO+)-R-195-O-16, (RhO+)-Rh-103-O-16 Cd-112(+), Sn-120(+), and Pd-106(+), respectively. All analytes were simultaneously interference-free determined by ICP-MS/MS, which demonstrates the potential of this instrumental analytical strategy for Cd, Sn, Pd, Pt, and Rh determination in complex samples. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据