4.7 Article

Functional cationic derivatives of starch as antimicrobial agents

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 412-423

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8py00740c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (Biomedical Research Council)
  2. Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (SERC Personal Care Program, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antimicrobial polymers with a broad spectrum of action and high selectivity towards pathogens (versus mammalian cells) provide the opportunity to combat infections with only a limited chance of resistance development. To this end, functional antimicrobial biodegradable materials derived from inexpensive renewable resources such as polysaccharides would pave the way for broader applications. Here we report a facile one-pot approach to access potent functional antimicrobial polymers from soluble starch, a renewable plant-based starting material and other readily available reagents. In solution-state, these polymers with optimal composition demonstrate excellent antibacterial activity, but limited antifungal properties. The reactive allyl groups installed onto this polymeric platform enabled seamless translation of these polymers into antimicrobial hydrogels and coatings via photo-mediated thiol-ene reactions. Both the hydrogels and hydrogel-coated cotton-pads exhibited high killing efficiencies across multiple strains of pathogens (approximate to 100% for S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa). Installation of reactive groups onto antimicrobial platforms allows for rapid development of formulations and prototypes in different forms such as solutions, gels and surface coatings by minimizing or completely eliminating the need to optimize the polymer to suit different applications. These results demonstrate the potential utility of cationic starch-based biodegradable polymers as antimicrobial materials and coatings for the prevention of infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据