4.2 Article

First Description of KPC-2-Producing Escherichia coli and ST15 OXA-48-Positive Klebsiella pneumoniae in Tunisia

期刊

MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 365-375

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2016.0090

关键词

Escherichia coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae; KPC-2; OXA-48; MLST; Tunisia

资金

  1. Faculty of Medecine, Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche Scientifique, in Tunisia [UR 12ES02]
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular features among Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli strains showing a resistant/intermediate-resistant phenotype to ertapenem (R/IR-ERT), implicated in colonization/infection in patients of the Hematology and Graft Units of the National Bone Marrow Transplant Center of Tunisia (3-year period, 2011-2014). The major carbapenemase, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, and plasmidic AmpC beta-lactamase genes were analyzed and characterized by PCR and sequencing. Genetic relatedness was determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using XbaI and multilocus sequencing typing. The bla(OXA-48) and bla(KPC) carbapenemase genes were detected among R/IR-ERT isolates. All R/IR-ERT K. pneumoniae strains (n=19) had bla(OXA-48) gene, and 14/19 strains also harbored the bla(CTX-M-15) gene. Eight different PFGE patterns were detected among these K. pneumoniae isolates, and they showed eight different sequences types, ST11 and ST15 being the most prevalent ones. Two out of three R/IR-ERT E. coli isolates carried bla(OXA-48) and one coproduced the bla(CTX-M-15) gene. One E. coli strain, ascribed to the new sequence type ST5700, harbored the bla(KPC-2) gene. E. coli isolates were not clonally related and belonged to different sequence types (ST5700, ST227, and ST58). To our knowledge, this is the first report in Tunisia of either KPC-2 carbapenemase in E. coli or OXA-48 carbapenemase in K. pneumoniae of lineage ST15.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据