4.7 Review

Brassinosteroid signaling in plant development and adaptation to stress

期刊

DEVELOPMENT
卷 146, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.151894

关键词

Brassinosteroid; Growth; Root; Stem cell; Stress

资金

  1. Severo Ochoa Programme for Centers of Excellence in R&D 2016-2019 from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [SEV-2015-0533]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte [FPU15/02822]
  3. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, Generalitat de Catalunya [FI-DGR 2016FI_B 00472]
  4. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Spain)
  5. FEDER (European Regional Development Fund of the European Union) [FIS2015-66503-C3-3-P]
  6. Generalitat de Catalunya through Grup de Recerca Consolidat [2017 SGR 1061]
  7. Ministerio de Economi'a y Competitividad [BIO2013-43873]
  8. ERC Consolidator Grant from the European Research Council [ERC-2015-CoG - 683163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brassinosteroids (BRs) are steroid hormones that are essential for plant growth and development. These hormones control the division, elongation and differentiation of various cell types throughout the entire plant life cycle. Our current understanding of the BR signaling pathway has mostly been obtained from studies using Arabidopsis thaliana as a model. In this context, the membrane steroid receptor BRI1 (BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1) binds directly to the BR ligand, triggering a signal cascade in the cytoplasm that leads to the transcription of BR-responsive genes that drive cellular growth. However, recent studies of the primary root have revealed distinct BR signaling pathways in different cell types and have highlighted cell-specific roles for BR signaling in controlling adaptation to stress. In this Review, we summarize our current knowledge of the spatiotemporal control of BR action in plant growth and development, focusing on BR functions in primary root development and growth, in stem cell selfrenewal and death, and in plant adaption to environmental stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据