4.7 Article

Fabrication of a Carbon Paper/Polyaniline-Copper Hybrid and Its Utilization as an Air Cathode for Microbial Fuel Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 1891-1902

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.8b02017

关键词

platinum; carbon paper; copper-polyaniline composite; air cathode; biofouling; microbial fuel cell

资金

  1. IITB-Monash Research Academy
  2. Monash University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of platinum (Pt) catalysts in air cathode for microbial fuel cells (MFCs) is expensive and is limiting the adoption of MFCs for power generation from wastewaters. In this study, we propose an innovative approach for the fabrication of a carbon paper/copper-polyaniline (CP/PANi-Cu) hybrid which can be employed as a relatively inexpensive and effective air cathode for MFCs. The CP/PANi-Cu hybrid cathode composed of the uniform layer and relatively strong adhesion of PANT-Cu to CP which enables a significant oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Consequently, the composite cathode demonstrated superior performance compared to that of a conventional Pt (CP/Pt) cathode by generating a maximum current of 0.50 +/- 0.02 mA cm(-2) compared with 0.35 +/- 0.03 mA cm(-2) obtained with the latter. When employed in MFCs, the power densities obtained with these cathodes were 0.244 +/- 0.014 mW cm(-2) under a current density of 0.85 +/- 0.08 mA cm(-2) for the Pt cathode, and 0.101 +/- 0.01 mW cm(-2) at 0.37 +/- 0.04 mA cm(-2) for the CP/PANi-Cu cathode. Moreover, the Nafion membrane attached to the CP/PANi-Cu cathode experienced much less biofouling than that used with the CP/Pt cathode and, thus, indicates that the new hybrid cathode is superior on the basis of overall performance, usage, and stability. A very detailed characterization of the Nafion membranes by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and 3D profilometry revealed more complex and thicker biofouling of the membrane attached to the CP/Pt cathode than that of the CP/PANi-Cu cathode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据