4.7 Article

A long-term (2002 to 2017) record of closed-path and open-path eddy covariance CO2 net ecosystem exchange fluxes from the Siberian Arctic

期刊

EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 221-240

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/essd-11-221-2019

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cluster of Excellence CliSAP, Universitat Hamburg through the German Science Foundation (DFG) [EXC177]
  2. European Commission [282700]
  3. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03G0836A, 03F0764A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ground-based observations of land-atmosphere fluxes are necessary to progressively improve global climate models. Observed data can be used for model evaluation and to develop or tune process models. In arctic permafrost regions, climate-carbon feedbacks are amplified. Therefore, increased efforts to better represent these regions in global climate models have been made in recent years. We present a multi-annual time series of land-atmosphere carbon dioxide fluxes measured in situ with the eddy covariance technique in the Siberian Arctic (72 degrees 22'N, 126 degrees 30'E). The site is part of the international network of eddy covariance flux observation stations (FLUXNET; site ID: Ru-Sam). The data set includes consistently processed fluxes based on concentration measurements of closed-path and open-path gas analyzers. With parallel records from both sensor types, we were able to apply a site-specific correction to open-path fluxes. This correction is necessary due to a deterioration of data, caused by heat generated by the electronics of open-path gas analyzers. Parameterizing this correction for subperiods of distinct sensor setups yielded good agreement between open- and closed-path fluxes. We compiled a long-term (2002 to 2017) carbon dioxide flux time series that we additionally gap-filled with a standardized approach. The data set was uploaded to the Pangaea database and can be accessed through https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.892751.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据