4.2 Article

In vitro degradation and mineralization of strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite coating on magnesium alloy synthesized via hydrothermal route

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE CERAMIC SOCIETY OF JAPAN
卷 127, 期 3, 页码 158-164

出版社

CERAMIC SOC JAPAN-NIPPON SERAMIKKUSU KYOKAI
DOI: 10.2109/jcersj2.18170

关键词

Strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite coating; Magnesium alloy; Hydrothermal synthesis; In vitro degradation and mineralization; Corrosion resistance

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51872197, 51572186, 81271954]
  2. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [15JCYBJC47500]
  3. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [16XD1424700, 15411951000]
  4. Tianjin-Hainan university innovation fund cooperation project [2017XZC-0104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnesium (Mg) and its alloy as promising biodegradable orthopaedic implants have gained immense attention by virtue of their superior biocompatibility and mechanical compatibility. In order to increase the long-term corrosion resistance of Mg and its alloys in clinical application, in this work, a series of strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite (SrHA) coatings were constructed on Mg alloy via hydrothermal route. These SrHA coatings possessed bilayer structure with flower-like clusters as the surface layer and flat surface as the bottom layer. Coating III with Sr/Ca molar ratio of 0.07 exhibited crack-free bottom layer and good interfacial adhesion, and its electrochemical corrosion resistance was higher than the counterparts. Moreover, this coating with high dissolution and rough surface rapidly induced SrHA mineralized layer formation, which gradually grew dense and thick, providing favorable long-term protection for Mg alloy. After immersion in simulated body fluid for 29 days, the average degradation rate of Mg alloy decreased to 0.17 mg/day.cm(2). The present work demonstrated that this SrHA coating was a potential protective coating for Mg and Mg alloy implants. (C) 2019 The Ceramic Society of Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据