4.6 Article

Mitigation of PEM Fuel Cell Catalyst Degradation with Porous Carbon Supports

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 166, 期 4, 页码 F198-F207

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0371904jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy [DE-EE0007271]
  2. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1650441]
  4. NSF MRSEC program [DMR 1719875]
  5. NSF MRI grant [DMR 1429155]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maintaining high performance after extensive use remains a key challenge for low-Pt proton exchange membrane fuel cells for transportation applications. Strategically improving catalyst durability requires better understanding of the relationship between degradation mechanisms and catalyst structure. To investigate the effects of the carbon support morphology, we compare the electrochemical performance and durability of membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) using Pt and PtCox catalysts with a range of porous, solid, and intermediate carbon supports (HSC, Vulcan, and acetylene black). We find that electrochemical surface area (ECSA) retention after a catalyst-targeted durability test tends to improve with increasing support porosity. Using electron microscopy, we investigate microstructural changes in the catalysts and reveal the underlying degradation mechanisms in MEA specimens. Pt migration to the membrane and catalyst coarsening, measured microscopically, together were quantitatively consistent with the ECSA loss, indicating that these were the only two significant degradation pathways. Changes in catalyst particle size, morphology, and PtCo core-shell structure indicate that Ostwald ripening is a significant coarsening mechanism for catalysts on all carbons, while particle coalescence is only significant on the more solid carbon supports. Porous carbon supports thus appear to protect against particle coalescence, providing an effective strategy for mitigating catalyst coarsening. (C) The Author(s) 2019. Published by ECS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据