4.8 Review

Na3V2(PO4)3: an advanced cathode for sodium-ion batteries

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 2556-2576

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr09391a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Research Program of China [2018YFB0905400]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51622210, 51872277, 21606003, 51802044, 51420105002]
  4. DNL cooperation Fund, CAS [DNL180310]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK3430000004]
  6. Opening Projects of CAS Key Laboratory of Materials for Energy Conversion
  7. State Key Laboratory of Vanadium and Titanium Resources Comprehensive Utilization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) are considered to be the most promising electrochemical energy storage devices for large-scale grid and electric vehicle applications due to the advantages of resource abundance and cost-effectiveness. The electrochemical performance of SIBs largely relies on the intrinsic chemical properties of the cathodic materials. Among the various cathodes, rhombohedral Na3V2(PO4)(3) (NVP), a typical sodium super ionic conductor (NASICON) compound, is very popular owing to its high Na+ mobility and firm structural stability. However, the relatively low electronic conductivity makes the theoretical capacity of NVP cathodes unviable even at low rates, not to mention the high rate of charging/discharging. This is a major drawback of NVPs, limiting their future large-scale applications. Herein, a comprehensive review of the recent progresses made in NVP fabrication has been presented, mainly including the strategies of developing NVP/carbon hybrid materials and elemental doping to improve the electronic conductivity of NVP cathodes and designing 3D porous architectures to enhance Na-ion transportation. Moreover, the application of NVP cathodic materials in Na-ion full batteries is summarized, too. Finally, some remarks are made on the challenges and perspectives for the future development of NVP cathodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据