4.2 Article

The current practice of open neck mass biopsy in the diagnosis of head and neck cancer: A retrospective cohort study

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lio2.240

关键词

Head and neck squamous cell cancer; metastatic lymph node; open neck mass biopsy

资金

  1. University of Michigan Head and Neck Cancer SPORE [NCI P50 CA97248]
  2. University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center Core Grant [NCI P30 CA46592]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To characterize current use of open neck mass biopsy for diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma in patients presenting with a neck mass. Methods Using the University of Michigan Specialized Program of Research Excellence in Head and Neck Cancer patient database (2008-2014), we reviewed patients' referral documentation to identify those who received open neck mass biopsies as part of their squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis. We compared subsequent treatment between patients who did and did not receive an open neck mass biopsy. Results Of 940 patients, 50 patients had received open neck mass biopsy leading to squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis. Only 19 of 50 patients (38%) had undergone fine-needle aspiration prior to open neck mass biopsy. There were no statistically significant differences in treatment or outcomes between patients who did and those who did not receive open neck mass biopsy. Conclusion Optimal care for patients who present with a neck mass is fine-needle aspiration. Unfortunately, these data show that many patients undergo open neck mass biopsy for diagnosis, often without prior fine-needle aspirate. Compared to fine-needle aspiration, open biopsy incurs additional risks of general anesthesia and greater surgical risks. While our data did not find statistically significant differences between treatment offered and outcomes, this small study was not expected to demonstrate a difference in outcomes. Further work is needed to promote the utility of fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of neck mass and to discourage use of open neck mass biopsy as a primary diagnostic interv

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据