4.7 Article

Techno-economic analysis of utility-scale energy storage in island settings

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 691-705

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2018.12.026

关键词

Utility-scale energy storage; RES integration; Battery energy storage; Lithium-ion Battery; Vanadium flow battery; Investment analysis

资金

  1. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) of the European Commission
  2. IN+/IST strategic Project [UID/EEA/50009/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The decarbonization of the electricity supply in isolated and remote energy systems is an open challenge in the transition to a sustainable energy system. In this paper, the possibility to increase the penetration of renewable energy sources for electricity generation on the island of Terceira (Azores) is investigated through the installation of a utility-scale energy storage facility. The electric power dispatch on the island is simulated through a unit commitment model of the fossil and renewable power plants that has the objective of minimizing the cost of electricity generation. Battery energy storage is employed to partially decouple production and supply, and to provide spinning reserve in case of sudden generator outage. Two technological options, namely lithium-ion and vanadium flow batteries, are compared in terms of net present value and return on investment, with the aim of supporting the decision-making process of the local utility. The economic evaluation takes also into account the degradation of the battery performance along the years. The results, obtained in a future-price scenario, show that both the technologies entail a positive investment performance. However, vanadium flow batteries have the best results, given that they can produce a net present value that exceeds 430% of the initial capital invested after 20 years, with a return on investment higher than 35%. In this scenario, the renewable share can reach up to 46%, compared to the current 26%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据