3.8 Article

Characteristics and Clinical Course of Dysphagia Caused by Anterior Cervical Osteophyte

期刊

ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 27-37

出版社

KOREAN ACAD REHABILITATION MEDICINE
DOI: 10.5535/arm.2019.43.1.27

关键词

Deglutition disorders; Osteophyte; Hyperostosis; Fluoroscopy; Surgical procedures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate swallowing characteristics of patients with dysphagia caused by anterior cervical osteophytes (ACOs) and compare clinical courses according to treatment options. Methods A retrospective analysis of 1,866 videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) of patients with ACOs from electronic medical records was performed. Patients with other diseases that could explain the dysphagia were excluded. Dysphagia characteristics and severity and clinical and radiological characteristics of subjects with ACOs were evaluated. Dysphagia characteristics and clinical course were compared among three treatment groups: surgical treatment, swallowing rehabilitation, and conservative treatment. Results Subjects were 22 men and 1 woman with a mean age of 78.69 +/- 8.01 years. The mean osteophyte thickness was 9.07 +/- 3.84 mm. It was significantly thicker in the surgical group than that in other groups (p=0.01). ACOs were most frequently found at C5 level. This level also had the thickest osteophytes. However, videofluoroscopic dysphagia scales (VDS) were not significantly different among the three treatment groups. The pharyngeal phase score of the VDS was significantly higher in the surgical group (p=0.041). Dysphagia severity was decreased significantly in the surgical group at 3 months after the initial VFSS (p=0.004). Conclusion The main swallowing characteristics in patients with ACOs were dysphagia features of the pharyngeal phase, including inappropriate airway protection, decreased laryngeal elevation, and reduced epiglottis inversion. When determining treatment options, it may be helpful to consider dysphagia severity at pharyngeal phase and osteophyte thickness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据