4.7 Article

Real-World Database Examining the Association between Sjogren's Syndrome and Chronic Rhinosinusitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm8020155

关键词

Sjogren's syndrome; sicca; autoimmune diseases; sinusitis

资金

  1. Health Information and Epidemiology Laboratory, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi Branch [CLRPG6G0041]
  2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi Branch [CGRPG6G0011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the risk of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) among patients with Sjogren's syndrome (SS). Method: A total of 18,723 patients diagnosed with SS between 1997 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Moreover, 59,568 patients without SS were matched to patients with SS at a 1:4 ratio on the basis of sex, age, urbanization level, income level, and the comorbidities of rhinitis and nasal sepal deviation. Patients were followed up until death or the end of the study period (31 December, 2013). The primary outcome was the occurrence of CRS. Results: The cumulative incidence of CRS was significantly higher in patients with SS than in those without SS (p < 0.001). The adjusted Cox proportional hazard model showed that patients with SS had a significantly higher incidence of CRS (hazard ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 2.22-2.84; p < 0.001). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses demonstrated SS was an independent risk factor for CRS. The dosage of intranasal corticosteroid spray used was not different between the SS and non-SS groups. Fewer patients with CRS in the SS group underwent sinus surgery (82/407 (20.2%)) than those in the non-SS group (179/667 (26.8%)) and this finding was statistically significant (p = 0.013). The number of operations did not differ significantly between patients with CRS in the SS and non-SS groups. Conclusions: SS is an independent risk factor for CRS. Our study extends the disease spectrum and prompts physicians to be aware of potential CRS occurrence after SS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据