4.6 Article

Folate-targeting and bovine serum albumin-gated mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a redox-responsive carrier for epirubicin release

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 2694-2701

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8nj05476b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21874087, 21575084]
  2. Hundred Talent Programme of Shanxi Province
  3. Shanxi Scholarship Council of China [2017-Key1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, distinctive nanomaterial-based mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) successively coupled with bovine serum albumin (BSA) and folic acid (FA) were engineered for targeting the release of epirubicin (EPI). The BSA molecule as a gatekeeper prevents untimely drug leakage until the BSA coating layer is biodegraded in response to GSH. FA promotes the specific intracellular delivery of the drug to high folate receptor (FR)-expressing cancer cells to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy. In vitro drug release profiles show that this drug carrier can avoid premature release of the drug under physiological conditions, and redox-responsive EPI release from EPI/MSN-FA with easy biodegradability is significantly accelerated in the presence of GSH due to the cleavage of the intramolecular disulfide bond; thus, a redox-triggered release of the drug in the simulated targeted tissue microenvironment is achieved. The folate-mediated cellular uptake measured by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) shows that the hybrid nanoparticles more likely enter the FR-positive (FR+) HepG2 cells than the FR-negative (FR-) PC-12 cells. Toxicity experiment also demonstrates the negligible toxicity of MSN-FA and an increase in the antitumor suppression of EPI/MSN-FA with an increase in the dosage. The results show that the strategy of combining mesoporous silica with protein molecules having stimuli-responsive biodegradability will offer new potential directions towards the on-demand drug release for pinpoint chemotherapy in cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据