4.5 Article

The association between periodontal disease and age-related macular degeneration in the Korea National health and nutrition examination survey A cross-sectional observational study

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 96, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006418

关键词

age-related macular degeneration; epidemiology; inflammation; Korean; periodontal disease

资金

  1. Hanyang University [201400000003108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Periodontal disease (PD) is associated with various systemic diseases. We investigated the association between PD and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). For this population-based, cross-sectional study, we enrolled 13,072 adults at least 40 years of age with gradable retinal fundus photographs and community periodontal index (CPI) data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) (2008-2010 and 2012). Participants were divided into a middle age group (age <= 62 years) and old age group (age >62 years). PD was divided into 2 categories of mild and severe. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between PD and AMD (early and late). The prevalence of PD and AMD in the study population was 37.4%+/- 0.8% and 5.6%+/- 0.2%, respectively. Overall, there was no significant difference in the proportion of participants with PD between those with and without AMD. Only participants with AMD in the middle age group had more any PD than those without AMD (P=0.031). Multivariate logistic regression model after adjusting for all confounding factors showed that PD was not significantly associated with AMD (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.22). However, according to degree of PD, participants with severe PD in the middle age group were 1.61 times more likely to have AMD (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.02-2.54). Our data, collected from an Asian population, showed that only severe PD is independently associated with AMD in individuals aged 62 years or younger.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据