4.8 Article

Extremely stable antimony-carbon composite anodes for potassium-ion batteries

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 615-623

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ee02836b

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [1438198]
  2. Maryland NanoCenter
  3. AIM Lab
  4. NSF
  5. Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) grant
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1438198] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potassium-ion batteries (PIBs) have been considered as promising alternatives to lithium-ion batteries due to potassium's high natural abundance of 2.09 wt% (vs. 0.0017 wt% for Li) and K/K+ having a low redox potential of -2.93 V (vs. -2.71 V for Na/Na+). However, PIB electrodes still suffer huge challenges due to the large K-ion radius and slow reaction dynamics. Herein, we report a high-capacity Sb@CSN composite anode with Sb nanoparticles uniformly encapsulated by a carbon sphere network (CSN) for PIBs. First-principles computations and electrochemical characterization confirm a reversible sequential phase transformation of KSb2, KSb, K5Sb4, and K3Sb during the potassiation/depotassiation process. In a concentrated 4 M KTFSI/EC + DEC electrolyte, the Sb@CSN anode delivers a high reversible capacity of 551 mA h g(-1) at 100 mA g(-1) after 100 cycles with an extremely slow capacity decay of only 0.06% per cycle from the 10th to 100th cycle; when at a high current density of 200 mA g(-1), the Sb@CSN anode still maintains a capacity of 504 mA h g(-1) after 220 cycles. The Sb@CSN anodes demonstrate one of the best electrochemical performances for all K-ion battery anodes reported to date. The exceptional performance of Sb@CSN should be attributed to the efficient encapsulation of small Sb nanoparticles in the conductive carbon network as well as the formation of a robust KF-rich SEI layer on the Sb@CSN anode in the concentrated 4 M KTFSI/EC + DEC electrolyte.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据