4.7 Article

Evidence for Crystalline Structure in Dynamically-Compressed Polyethylene up to 200 GPa

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40782-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  2. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences [SF00515, DE-SC0018298]
  3. Helmholtz Association [VH-NG-1141]
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [16K17846]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  6. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Grant [8-ERD-033]
  7. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [05P15RDFA1]
  8. University of California, Center for High Energy Density Science at UC Berkeley
  9. DOE FES [FWP 1001182]
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K17846] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the high-pressure behavior of polyethylene (CH2) by probing dynamically-compressed samples with X-ray diffraction. At pressures up to 200 GPa, comparable to those present inside icy giant planets (Uranus, Neptune), shock-compressed polyethylene retains a polymer crystal structure, from which we infer the presence of significant covalent bonding. The A2/m structure which we observe has previously been seen at significantly lower pressures, and the equation of state measured agrees with our findings. This result appears to contrast with recent data from shock-compressed polystyrene (CH) at higher temperatures, which demonstrated demixing and recrystallization into a diamond lattice, implying the breaking of the original chemical bonds. As such chemical processes have significant implications for the structure and energy transfer within ice giants, our results highlight the need for a deeper understanding of the chemistry of high pressure hydrocarbons, and the importance of better constraining planetary temperature profiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据