4.7 Article

Super-Eddington Accretion onto the Galactic Ultraluminous X-Ray Pulsar Swift J0243.6+6124

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 873, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0211

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; magnetic fields; pulsars: individual (Swift J0243.6+6124); stars: neutron; X-rays: binaries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [U1838115, U1838201]
  2. CAS Pioneer Hundred Talent Program [Y8291130K2]
  3. Scientific and technological innovation project of IHEP [Y7515570U1]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA040080X, 2018YFA0404502]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11633003, 11821303]
  6. Chinese NSFC [U1838201, 11733009, 11473027, 11673023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on the spectral behavior of the first Galactic ultraluminous X-ray pulsar Swift. J0243.6+6124 with NuSTAR observations during its 2017-2018 outburst. At sub-Eddington levels, the source spectrum is characterized by three emission components: from the accretion column, the hot spot, and a broad iron line emission region. When the source is above the Eddington limit, the hot spot temperature increases and the spectrum features two more blackbody components. One blackbody component has a radius of 10-20 km and likely originate from the top of the accretion column. The other one saturates at a blackbody luminosity of (1-2) x 10(38) erg s(-1), coincident with the Eddington limit of a neutron star. This is consistent with the scenario that super-Eddington accretion onto compact objects will power optically thick outflows and indicates an accretion rate 60-80 times the critical value. This suggests that super-Eddington accretion onto magnetized systems can also power massive winds. At super-Eddington levels, the iron line becomes more significant and blueshifted, and is argued to be associated with the ultrafast wind in the central funnel or jets. This source, if located in external galaxies, will appear like other ultraluminous pulsars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据