4.7 Article

The Efficiencies, Environmental Impacts and Economics of Energy Consumption for Groundwater-Based Irrigation in Oklahoma

期刊

AGRICULTURE-BASEL
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture9020027

关键词

pumping plants; energy audit; life cycle assessment; greenhouse gas emission; center-pivot irrigation

类别

资金

  1. Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station (Hatch funds) from the National Institute for Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture
  2. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension (Smith-Lever funds) from the National Institute for Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture
  3. Oklahoma Water Resources Center through the U.S. Geological Survey 104(b) grants program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Irrigation pumping is a major expense of agricultural operations, especially in arid/semi-arid areas that extract large amounts of water from deep groundwater resources. Studying and improving pumping efficiencies can have direct impacts on farm net profits and on the amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted from pumping plants. In this study, the overall pumping efficiency (OPE), the GHG emissions, and the costs of irrigation pumping were investigated for electric pumps extracting from the Rush Springs (RS) aquifer in central Oklahoma and the natural gas-powered pumps tapping the Ogallala (OG) aquifer in the Oklahoma Panhandle. The results showed that all electric plants and the majority of natural gas plants operated at OPE levels below achievable standard levels. The total emission from the plants in the OG region was 49% larger than that from plants in the RS region. However, the emission per unit irrigated area and unit total dynamic head of pumping was 4% smaller for the natural gas plants in the OG area. A long-term analysis conducted over the 2001-2017 period revealed that 34% and 19% reductions in energy requirements and 52% and 20% decreases in GHG emissions can be achieved if the OPE were improved to achievable standards for plants in the RS and OG regions, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据