4.6 Article

Glucose oxidase-loaded liposomes for in situ amplified signal of electrochemical immunoassay on a handheld pH meter

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 1372-1379

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8nj05637d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61705177, 61335012, 61727823, 61575156, 61775178, 61505159]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M613107, 2015M572570]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methods based on a pH meter have been developed for immunoassays, but most involve low sensitivity and weakly detectable signals, and thus are unsuitable for routine use. Herein, a simple and portable electrochemical immunoassay was designed for sensitive screening of a disease-related biomarker, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), by using glucose oxidase-loaded liposomes (GOx-LS) for signal amplification. Initially, a sandwiched immunoreaction was performed on rabbit anti-human monoclonal NSE antibody-coated microplate with polyclonal rabbit anti-human NSE antibody-labeled GOx-LS. Thereafter, the GOx-LS accompanying the immunocomplex could oxidize glucose into gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide, thus resulting in the pH change of the detection solution, which could be registered on a handheld pH meter. Relative to GOx-labeling, use of GOx-LS could amplify the signal of the electrochemical immunosensing platform. Under optimum conditions, the GOx-LS-based immunoassay exhibited good pH responses toward target NSE within the dynamic linear range of 0.01-100 ng mL(-1) with a detection limit of 8.9 pg mL(-1). The coefficients of variation for the reproducibility and precision of this method were less than 7.9% and 12.7% for the single-batch and different-batch identification, respectively. High specificity and acceptable stability were acquired for determining target NSE using this method. For the detection of human serum specimens, well-matched results were provided between pH-based immunoassay and commercial Electrochemiluminescent Automatic Analyzer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据