4.6 Article

An Electrooculogram-Based Interaction Method and Its Music-on-Demand Application in a Virtual Reality Environment

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 22059-22070

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2898324

关键词

Electrooculogram (EOG); virtual reality (VR); human-computer interface (HCI); eye blink; music-on-demand

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1002505]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61633010]
  3. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2014A030312005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, the devices commonly used for interaction with a virtual reality (VR) environment include game controllers, data gloves, and motion tracking systems. However, these devices may limit the immersive experience or cause inconvenience, especially for patients with limb paralysis. This paper proposes a new nonmanual human-computer interface (HCI) based on a single-channel electrooculogram (EOG) signal and enables real-time interactions with the VR environment. The graphical user interface of the EOG-based HCI in VR includes several buttons flashing in a random order. The user needs to blink in synchrony with the corresponding button's flashes to issue a command, while the algorithm detects the eye blinks from the EOG signal and determines the users' target button. Furthermore, with the EOG-based HCI, we developed a music-on-demand system in the VR environment. By blinking, users can search and select target songs in the music library, play the selected songs, switch to the next song, and delete songs from the list. Ten healthy subjects and five patients with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) participated in online experiments. The experimental results demonstrated the effectiveness of the EOG-based HCI as a new method for interacting with the VR environment. Furthermore, the music-on-demand system can be used for entertainment not only by healthy people but also by SCI patients with limb paralysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据