3.8 Article

Nomenclature and semantic description of vascular lesions in small bowel capsule endoscopy: an international Delphi consensus statement

期刊

ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 E372-E379

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-0761-9742

关键词

-

资金

  1. Societe Nationale Francaise de Gastroenterologie
  2. MSD France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and study aims Nomenclature and descriptions of small bowel (SB) vascular lesions in capsule endoscopy (CE) are scarce in the medical literature. They are mostly based on the reader's opinion and thus differ between experts, with a potential negative impact on clinical care, teaching and research regarding SBCE. Our aim was to better define a nomenclature and to give a description of the most frequent vascular lesions in SBCE. Methods A panel of 18 European expert SBCE readers was formed during the UEGW 2016 meeting. Three experts constructed an Internet-based four-round Delphi consensus, but did not participate in the voting process. They built questionnaires that included various still frames of vascular lesions obtained with a third-generation SBCE system. The 15 remaining participants were asked to rate different proposals and description of the most common SB vascular lesions. A 6-point rating scale (varying from strongly disagree' to strongly agree') was used successive rounds. The consensus was reached when at least 80% voting members scored the statement within the agree' or strongly agree'. Results Consensual terms and descriptions were reached for angiectasia/angiodysplasia, erythematous patch, red spot/dot, and phlebectasia. A consensual description was reached for more subtle vascular lesions tentatively named diminutive angiectasia but no consensus was reached for this term. Conclusion An international group has reached a consensus on the nomenclature and descriptions of the most frequent and relevant SB vascular lesions in CE. These terms and descriptions are useful in daily practice, for teaching and for medical research purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据