4.6 Article

Attribute recognition model for risk assessment of water inrush

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-017-1159-4

关键词

Risk assessment; Attribute recognition model; Water inrush; Attribute mathematic theory

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB036000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51609129, 51479107]
  3. State Key Lab of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology [2016ZB07]
  4. State Key Laboratory for GeoMechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining Technology [SKLGDUEK1515]
  5. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2014EEQ002]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017T100492, 2017M612273]
  7. Shandong postdoctoral innovation project special Foundation [201502025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An attribute recognition model of water inrush risk evaluation is established based on attribute mathematic theory and software is developed for risk assessment in a tunnel. In our model, the entropy weight method is applied to analyze the weights of evaluation indexes. Considering karst hydrologic and engineering geological conditions of a tunnel under construction, eight major influencing factors of water inrush (formation lithology, unfavorable geology, groundwater level, attitude of rocks, contact zone of dissolvable and insoluble rocks, layer and interlayer fissures, catchment ability and surrounding rock mass classification) are selected as the evaluation indexes, and an index system of water inrush risk assessment is constituted. The tunnel is divided into 26 sections, and 340 evaluation objects are selected from these 26 sections in order to construct a judgment matrix. The water inrush risk of the whole tunnel is evaluated by using the proposed software. The results indicate that the attribute recognition model of water inrush risk evaluation is scientific and reasonable and that the software is convenient for use in calculations and is easy to master.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据