4.3 Article

Infectivity is influenced by parasite spore age and exposure to freezing: do shallow waters provide Daphnia a refuge from some parasites?

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 12-16

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fby046

关键词

abiotic factors; burst size; spore; fitness; Daphnia dentifera; Metschnikowia; Pasteuria

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [DEB-1353806]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences [1353806] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [1353806] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parasites impact ecological and evolutionary dynamics of Daphnia populations, their interactions with other food web members, and even ecosystem-level processes. Thus, there is interest in understanding factors that influence the infectivity and yield of transmission stages (spores) of common Daphnia parasites. We tested the impact of spore age (from 1 day to 1 year) and storage temperature (-20 degrees C vs. 4 degrees C) on infectivity and spore yield using two common parasites: the bacterium Pasteuria ramosa and the fungus Metschnikowia bicuspidata. Pasteuria spores remained infective even after 1 year at both temperatures, though spore yields dropped over time. In contrast, Metschnikowia spores were killed within days at -20 degrees C, indicating that they are intolerant of freezing. Previous studies of lake populations of Daphnia have found that Metschnikowia prevalence can be high, whereas studies of ponds and rock pools have found low prevalence. The high sensitivity of Metschnikowia to freezing might help explain this pattern. Our study also found differences in spore survival at 4 degrees C: while Pasteuria spores remained highly infective even after a year, Metschnikowia spores were no longer infective after 4 months. This finding suggests that Pasteuria spores might remain infective for longer in sediment spore banks in stratified lakes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据