4.8 Article

H3K27M induces defective chromatin spread of PRC2-mediated repressive H3K27me2/me3 and is essential for glioma tumorigenesis

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09140-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P01-CA196539, GM110174, T32GM008275, TL1TR001880]
  2. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-286756, FDN-154307, EP1-120608, P.J.T.-156086]
  3. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec en Sante (FRQS)
  4. FRQS
  5. Genome Canada
  6. Genome Quebec
  7. TD CanadaTrust/Montreal Children's Hospital Foundation
  8. CIHR
  9. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  10. Matthew Larson Foundation
  11. ERC (H3.3Cancer)
  12. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA196539] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  13. MRC [MC_U132670601, MR/M00094X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lys-27-Met mutations in histone 3 genes (H3K27M) characterize a subgroup of deadly gliomas and decrease genome-wide H3K27 trimethylation. Here we use primary H3K27M tumor lines and isogenic CRISPR-edited controls to assess H3K27M effects in vitro and in vivo. We find that whereas H3K27me3 and H3K27me2 are normally deposited by PRC2 across broad regions, their deposition is severely reduced in H3.3K27M cells. H3K27me3 is unable to spread from large unmethylated CpG islands, while H3K27me2 can be deposited outside these PRC2 high-affinity sites but to levels corresponding to H3K27me3 deposition in wild-type cells. Our findings indicate that PRC2 recruitment and propagation on chromatin are seemingly unaffected by K27M, which mostly impairs spread of the repressive marks it catalyzes, especially H3K27me3. Genome-wide loss of H3K27me3 and met deposition has limited transcriptomic consequences, preferentially affecting lowly-expressed genes regulating neurogenesis. Removal of H3K27M restores H3K27me2/me3 spread, impairs cell proliferation, and completely abolishes their capacity to form tumors in mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据