4.2 Article

Study of microwave acoustic attenuation in a multifrequency bulk acoustic wave resonator based on a synthetic diamond single crystal

期刊

ACOUSTICAL PHYSICS
卷 61, 期 6, 页码 669-680

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1063771015050164

关键词

microwave frequencies; acoustic resonator; synthetic diamond single crystal; attenuation; acoustoelectronics; Landau-Rumer regime; Akhiezer regime; damaged layer; Kikuchi lines

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [RFMEFI57414X0074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acoustic attenuation in a multifrequency bulk acoustic wave resonator based on the synthetic diamond single crystal is investigated. The acoustic energy loss in a layered piezoelectric Al/AlN/Mo/(001) diamond structure is analyzed. The depth of a damaged surface layer with a thickness of 20-30 nm in diamond after abrasive finishing is estimated using high-energy electron backscattered diffraction and observation of Kikuchi lines. The estimation shows that the acoustic energy loss at a diamond substrate roughness of up to 20 nm, as well as acoustic loss in thin films, is lower than the bulk acoustic attenuation by an order of magnitude and is of no fundamental importance. However, the surface roughness of the piezoelectric AlN film can contribute comparably with the bulk attenuation in the substrate. It is demonstrated that the transition from the Akhiezer to Landau-Rumer regime in diamond occurs at a frequency of similar to 1 GHz and the phonon-phonon relaxation time is similar to 1.6 x 10(-10) s. Calculation of acoustic attenuation showed that, although at a frequency of similar to 1 GHz the acoustic loss in diamond is somewhat higher than in well-known materials with a low attenuation level, the loss in diamond becomes noticeably lower as frequency increases to 8-10 GHz. The obtained maximum experimental value Qf a parts per thousand 10 x 10(13) Hz (9.5 GHz) makes synthetic diamond promising for microwave acoustoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据