4.6 Article

Effects of different land use and land cover data on the landslide susceptibility zonation of road networks

期刊

NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 471-487

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-19-471-2019

关键词

-

资金

  1. FCT-Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. [PTDC/GES-AMB/30052/2017]
  2. Centre for Geographical Studies [UID/GEO/00295/2013]
  3. Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning and Universidade de Lisboa, IGOT-UL (BD2015)
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/GES-AMB/30052/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work evaluates the influence of land use and land cover (LUC) data with different properties on the landslide susceptibility zonation of the road network in the Zezere watershed (Portugal). The information value method was used to assess the landslide susceptibility using two models: one including detailed LUC data (the Portuguese Land Cover Map - COS) and the other including more generalized LUC data (the CORINE Land Cover - CLC). A set of fixed independent layers was considered as landslide predisposing factors (slope angle, slope aspect, slope curvature, slope-over-area ratio, soil, and lithology) while COS and CLC were used to find the differences in the landslide susceptibility zonation. A landslide inventory was used as a dependent layer, including 259 shallow landslides obtained from the photointerpretation of orthophotos from 2005, and further validated in three sample areas. The landslide susceptibility maps were assigned to the road network data and resulted in two landslide susceptibility road network maps. The models' performance was evaluated with prediction and success rate curves and the area under the curve (AUC). The landslide susceptibility results obtained in the two models present a high accuracy in terms of the AUC (>90 %), but the model with more detailed LUC data (COS) produces better results in the landslide susceptibility zonation on the road network with the highest landslide susceptibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据