4.7 Article

Hints for a Turnover at the Snow Line in the Giant Planet Occurrence Rate

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 874, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0300

关键词

methods: statistical; planetary systems; planets and satellites: formation; protoplanetary disks; surveys

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [BSSGI0_155816]
  2. NASA Science Mission directorate
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX15AD94G]
  4. NASAs Science Mission Directorate
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The orbital distribution of giant planets is crucial for understanding how terrestrial planets form and predicting yields of exoplanet surveys. Here, we derive giant planets occurrence rates as a function of orbital period by taking into account the detection efficiency of the Kepler and radial velocity (RV) surveys. The giant planet occurrence rates for Kepler and RV show the same rising trend with increasing distance from the star. We identify a break in the RV giant planet distribution between similar to 2 and 3 au-close to the location of the snow line in the solar systemafter which the occurrence rate decreases with distance from the star. Extrapolating a broken power-law distribution to larger semimajor axes, we find good agreement with the similar to 1% planet occurrence rates from direct imaging surveys. Assuming a symmetric power law, we also estimate that the occurrence of giant planets between 0.1 and 100 au is 26.6(-5.4)(+7.5)% for planets with masses 0.1-20 M-J and decreases to 6.2(-1.2)(+1.5)% for planets more massive than Jupiter. This implies that only a fraction of the structures detected in disks around young stars can be attributed to giant planets. Various planet population synthesis models show good agreement with the observed distribution, and we show how a quantitative comparison between model and data can be used to constrain planet formation and migration mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据