期刊
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 339-351出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0013164415593777
关键词
mediation; indirect effects; SEM; bias-corrected bootstrapping; simulation
A large number of approaches have been proposed for estimating and testing the significance of indirect effects in mediation models. In this study, four sets of Monte Carlo simulations involving full latent variable structural equation models were run in order to contrast the effectiveness of the currently popular bias-corrected bootstrapping approach with the simple test of joint significance approach. The results from these simulations demonstrate that the test of joint significance had more power than bias-corrected bootstrapping and also yielded more reasonable Type I errors.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据