4.5 Article

Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of curcumin-silver nanoparticles with improved stability and selective toxicity to bacteria over mammalian cells

期刊

MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
卷 207, 期 1, 页码 39-53

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00430-017-0525-y

关键词

Curcumin; Silver nanoparticle; Antibiofilm; Antibacterial; Minimum inhibitory concentration; Selective toxicity; Macrophage

资金

  1. MHRD (Ministry of Human Resource and Development) Grant of Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), New Delhi
  2. MeitY (Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology)
  3. ICMR (Indian Council of Medical Research), Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotic resistance has necessitated search for new antibacterials for combating threat of pathogenic bacteria. Though chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles are a well-known antimicrobial agent, they are toxic to human cells at higher concentrations. Hence in the present study, curcumin-silver nanoparticles (Cur-AgNPs) of size 25-35 nm, were synthesized using curcumin, a phytochemical. These nanoparticles were effective against both Gram positive and Gram-negative bacteria and were less toxic to human keratinocytes. They had very low total silver content and high stability. The antibacterial activity of Cur-AgNPs, as studied by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC = 5 mg/L), time kill kinetics and post agent effect, was better than silver nanoparticles (AgNPs, size ae 35 nm, MIC = 20 mg/L). The inhibitory effect of Cur-AgNPs on biofilm formation was also ae 20% more than AgNPs as demonstrated by live-dead imaging and scanning electron microscopy. The cytotoxic test to skin keratinocytes (HaCaT) showed that Cur-AgNPs were toxic at a concentration of 156 mg/L which is much higher than the bacterial MIC (selective toxicity). They also showed anti-inflammatory effect on human macrophages (THP1) by reducing secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-alpha as compared to chemically synthesized AgNPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据