4.6 Review

A Review of Approaches for Sleep Quality Analysis

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 24527-24546

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900345

关键词

Sleep quality analysis; monitoring devices; home detection

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology through the Projeto Estrategico LA 9 [UID/EEA/50009/2019]
  2. Agencia Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigacao, Tecnologia e Inovacao [M1420-09-5369-FSE-000001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sleep quality is directly related to overall wellness and can reveal symptoms of several diseases. However, the term sleep quality'' still lacks a definitional consensus and is commonly assessed in sleep labs with polysomnography, comprising high costs, or through sleep questionnaires, a highly subjective technique. Multiple methods have been proposed to address the estimation of sleep quality, and devices were developed to conduct the examination in the subject's home. The objective of this paper is to analyze the methods and the devices presented in the literature, assessing the development of objective markers that could lead to an improvement of the subjective sleep experience understanding, leading to developments in the treatment of sleep quality deficits. A systematic review was conducted, selecting research articles published from 2000 to 2018, and two research questions were formulated, specifically, what methods for sleep quality assessment have been developed'' and what kind of measures are employed by the devices that have been developed to estimate sleep quality.'' The research trend for the assessment of sleep quality is based on the sleep macrostructure, and it was verified that despite the convenience and considerable popularity among the consumers of home health monitoring of devices, such as actigraphs, the validity of these tools regarding the estimation of sleep quality still needs to be systematically examined. A detailed resume of the key findings and the identified challenges are presented, ascertaining the main gaps in the current state of the art.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据