4.7 Review

Vision-based and marker-less surgical tool detection and tracking: a review of the literature

期刊

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 633-654

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.09.003

关键词

Tool detection; Object detection; Data-set; Validation; Endoscopichnicroscopic images

资金

  1. Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
  2. Rabin Ezra foundation
  3. EPSRC
  4. Royal Academy of Engineering/EPSRC Fellowship
  5. EPSRC [EP/P012841/1, EP/N013220/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P012841/1, EP/N013220/1, 1091178] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, tremendous progress has been made in surgical practice for example with Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS). To overcome challenges coming from deported eye-to-hand manipulation, robotic and computer-assisted systems have been developed. Having real-time knowledge of the pose of surgical tools with respect to the surgical camera and underlying anatomy is a key ingredient for such systems. In this paper, we present a review of the literature dealing with vision-based and marker-less surgical tool detection. This paper includes three primary contributions: (1) identification and analysis of data-sets used for developing and testing detection algorithms, (2) in-depth comparison of surgical tool detection methods from the feature extraction process to the model learning strategy and highlight existing shortcomings, and (3) analysis of validation techniques employed to obtain detection performance results and establish comparison between surgical tool detectors. The papers included in the review were selected through PubMed and Google Scholar searches using the keywords: surgical tool detection, surgical tool tracking, surgical instrument detection and surgical instrument tracking limiting results to the year range 2000 2015. Our study shows that despite significant progress over the years, the lack of established surgical tool data-sets, and reference format for performance assessment and method ranking is preventing faster improvement. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据