4.5 Article

Natural Regeneration of the Mangrove Vegetation on Abandoned Salt Ponds in Ceara, in the Semi-Arid Region of Northeastern Brazil

期刊

DIVERSITY-BASEL
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d11020027

关键词

historical ecology; integrated analysis; geotechnology; environmental dynamics; habitat regeneration

资金

  1. CAPES/REUNI [35755268851]
  2. Support Program for Postgraduate and Scientific and Technological Research in Socioeconomic Development in Brazil [PGPSE-CAPES 88887.123947 / 2016-00]
  3. Institutional Program for Internationalization [PRINT / CAPES 88887.312019 / 2018-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of the mangrove in Ceara state, northeastern Brazil, is limited by local environmental and climatic factors, associated with the variables that determine the region's semi-arid climatic conditions. The same conditions also contribute to the installation of artisanal saltworks in estuarine environments. The artisanal production of salt peaked in the 20th century, but with the decline of this activity, the salt evaporation ponds were abandoned, and have been incorporated back into the natural marine-estuarine environment and colonized by mangrove forests. In the early 2000s, however, the expansion of shrimp farming operations impacted this same environment. The present study was based on a spatiotemporal analysis of the natural regeneration of the mangrove vegetation in abandoned salt pond areas in the Brazilian semi-arid region between 1968 and 2009. The integrated analysis of mangrove ecosystem dynamics and the legislation that regulates the licensing of these economic activities identified a number of technical problems in the formulation and execution of the COEMA resolution 02/2002, which permits the installation of shrimp farms in areas dominated by the mangrove. The findings of the present study reinforce the need for a careful reformulation of the Ceara state environmental legislation, in order to guarantee the maximum possible conservation of the coastal zone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据