期刊
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 204-221出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1505013
关键词
Advice sources; engagement; forest management; forest ownership; Inland Northwest; working landscapes
资金
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [2010-67023-21705]
- NIFA [580424, 2010-67023-21705] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
Non-industrial private forestland (NIPF) owners have options for engagement by following management strategies that reduce wildfire risk on their forestlands. Forest management engagement is a broad term with underlying categories and management implications. To better understand these categories, we examine interview data on the engagement of forest landowners from a case study of private forestland owner perspectives in northeast Oregon, USA. NIPF landowners outline two types of forest management engagement, one for property and one for community-focused forestland management. NIPF owners describe actions for engagement in public forestland management and how these actions differ from engagement in private management. Additionally, NIPF owners establish barriers to engagement in both public and private forestland management. Our findings can be used to better identify unengaged private forestland owners in the U.S. West, informing the design and implementation of extension and outreach for NIPF owners.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据