4.4 Article

Costs and Trends in Utilization of Low-value Services Among Older Adults With Commercial Insurance or Medicare Advantage

期刊

MEDICAL CARE
卷 55, 期 11, 页码 931-939

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000809

关键词

low-value care; Medicare Advantage; commercial insurance; older adults; administrative claims

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Overutilization of low-value services (unnecessary or minimally beneficial tests or procedures) has been cited as a large contributor to the high costs of health care in the United States. Objectives: To analyze trends in utilization of low-value services from 2009 to 2014 among commercial and Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollees 50 and older. Research Design: A retrospective analysis of deidentified claims obtained from the OptumLab Data Warehouse. Subjects: Adults 50 and older enrolled in commercial plans and adults 65 and older enrolled in MA plans between 2009 and 2014. Measures: Costs and utilization of 16 low-value services in the following categories: cancer screening, imaging, and invasive procedures. Results: The most commonly performed low-value service was imaging of the head for syncope, at rates of 33%-39% in commercial enrollees and 45% in MA enrollees. The least common service was peripheral artery stenting (< 1%) in commercial enrollees, and laminectomy (0.15% in 2009) and renal artery stenting in MA enrollees (0.07% in 2014). Renal artery stenting decreased by roughly 75% over the study period, the largest decrease in utilization, with similar to$30 million and $10 million in reduced spending for commercial and MA plans and enrollees, respectively. Spending on these services in 2014 totaled $317.6 million for commercial and $100.8 million for MA health plans. Conclusions: Clinicians, researchers, and policymakers should strive to reach consensus on methods for more reliably and accurately identifying low-value service utilization. Greater consistency would facilitate monitoring use of low-value services and changing clinical practice patterns over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据