4.5 Article

Refined multiscale fuzzy entropy based on standard deviation for biomedical signal analysis

期刊

MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING
卷 55, 期 11, 页码 2037-2052

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1647-5

关键词

Complexity; Multiscale entropy; Sample entropy; Fuzzy entropy; Biomedical signal; Statistical moments

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiscale entropy (MSE) has been a prevalent algorithm to quantify the complexity of biomedical time series. Recent developments in the field have tried to alleviate the problem of undefined MSE values for short signals. Moreover, there has been a recent interest in using other statistical moments than the mean, i.e., variance, in the coarse-graining step of the MSE. Building on these trends, here we introduce the so-called refined composite multiscale fuzzy entropy based on the standard deviation (RCMFE sigma) and mean (RCMFE mu) to quantify the dynamical properties of spread and mean, respectively, over multiple time scales. We demonstrate the dependency of the RCMFE sigma and RCMFE mu, in comparison with other multiscale approaches, on several straightforward signal processing concepts using a set of synthetic signals. The results evidenced that the RCMFE sigma and RCMFE mu values are more stable and reliable than the classical multiscale entropy ones. We also inspect the ability of using the standard deviation as well as the mean in the coarse-graining process using magnetoencephalograms in Alzheimer's disease and publicly available electroencephalograms recorded from focal and non-focal areas in epilepsy. Our results indicated that when the RCMFE mu cannot distinguish different types of dynamics of a particular time series at some scale factors, the RCMFE sigma may do so, and vice versa. The results showed that RCMFE sigma-based features lead to higher classification accuracies in comparison with the RCMFE mu-based ones. We also made freely available all the Matlab codes used in this study at http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/ds/1477.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据