4.8 Article

Oxygen defect-induced localized surface plasmon resonance at the WO3-x quantum dot/silver nanowire interface: SERS and photocatalysis

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 5535-5547

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9nr01059a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFB0303901-05]
  2. Outstanding Academic Leaders program of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [15XD1501700]
  3. Changjiang Scholars programmes [T2015136]
  4. [51325203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen defects play a crucial role in a variety of functional transition metal oxides, ranging from photocatalytic materials to photoelectric devices. Tungsten oxide (WO3-x) is a type of transition metal oxide that has rich substoichiometric compositions and possesses oxygen defects. These oxygen defects determine the photon-electron interactions in the WO3-x structures. Therein, WO3-x quantum dots (QDs) exhibit fast carrier-transport for photon-electron interactions due to their strong quantum-size effects. Here, we report the use of non-stoichiometric WO3-x QDs, as a model material, in combination with silver nanowires (Ag NWs) to study photon-electron interactions on the nanoscale. We demonstrate that the incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency can be increased by 8.5% and that the dye photodegradation performance was improved by 40% in a WO2.72 QD@Ag NW (WO2.72 QDs supported on AgNWs) composite compared to those of individual WO2.72 QDs under simulated AM 1.5G light. Furthermore, the WO3-x QD@Ag NW composite exhibits both photocatalytic activity and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) features, and the WO3-x QDs can be switched between a photocatalytic state and a SERS state by changing the stoichiometric ratio. The synergistic effects are ascribed to the plasmonic state of WO2.72 QDs upon light irradiation. This work provides new insight into the design of highly efficient transition metal oxide/plasmonic metal nanocomposites for photoelectric devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据