4.7 Article

Interaction of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species and associated regulation of root growth in wheat seedlings under zinc stress

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 95-102

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.11.030

关键词

Hydrogen peroxide; Nitric oxide; Root growth; Wheat; Zinc

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470464, 31360094]
  2. Science and technology plan project of Gansu Province [144FKCA059]
  3. Technology Development Plan Program of Lanzhou City [2011-1-142]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inhibition of root growth was investigated in wheat seedlings exposed to 3 mM zinc (Zn). Zn treatment with or without 250 mu M 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5,-tetrame-thylimidazoline-3-oxide-1-oxyl (PTIO) or 10 mu M diphenylene iodonium (DPI) significantly inhibited growth, increased malondialdehyde content and lowered cell viability in roots. The most prominent changes of these three parameters at Zn+DPI treatment could be partly blocked by high FTIO concentration (1 mM). The production of nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) influenced each other under different treatments, with the highest NO level and the highest H2O2 accumulation in Zn+DPI-treated roots. Compared with Zn-stressed roots, catalase, soluble peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutase decreased in Zn+DPI-treated roots, suggesting that ROS generation from plasma membrane (PM) NADPH oxidase was associated with the regulation of antioxidant enzyme activities. Additionally, Zn-treated roots exhibited significant decreases in cell wall-bound POD, diamine oxidase and polyamine oxidase activities. Our results suggested that Zn-induced effects on root growth resulted from NO interaction with H2O2 and that Zn+DPI-induced strongest inhibition could be explained by the highest increase in the endogenous NO content and the reduction of extracellular ROS production. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据