4.6 Article

Highly Sensitive Detection of Carbendazim and Its Electrochemical Oxidation Mechanism at a Nanohybrid Sensor

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 166, 期 6, 页码 B322-B327

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0251906jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31660492, 51662014]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20181BAB204017]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation in China [2015M571987]
  4. Special Funds for Postdoctoral Research in Jiangxi Province [2015KY44]
  5. Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education [GJJ170273]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sensitive and rapid detection of pesticides in food has become an important and crucial research area due to the extensive use of agriculture residues and stringent environmental protection acts. In present work, an electrochemical nanohybrid sensor was facilely developed based on carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) fuctionalized carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The sensor shows high sensitivity, excellent stability and good anti-interference capability in the detection of carbendazim (MBC) by differential pulse voltammetry method. Under optimized conditions, it exhibits a wide linearity of 0.03 mu mol.L-1 -10 mu mol.L-1 with a low detection limit of 0.015 mu mol.L-1. In real samples analyses for peer and kiwifruit, the proposed sensor shows good recoveries which are comparable with that of the conventional HPLC method. In addition, the oxidation mechanism of MBC at the nanohybrid sensor was studied using voltammetric methods and validated according to the density functional theory (DFT) calculation. The results reveal that the oxidation of carbendazim is a typical adsorption-controlled electrochemical oxidation process proceeding with four protons and four electrons. The proposed nanohybrid sensor is a promising alternative to the currently used methods for carbendazim detection and our results provide a new insight in MBC electrochemical oxidation mechanism. (C) 2019 The Electrochemical Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据