4.7 Article

Computational prediction and experimental validation of revolute joint clearance wear in the low-velocity planar mechanism

期刊

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 963-976

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.09.027

关键词

Revolute joint; Wear; Clearance contact; Multibody dynamics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51305143, 51675190, 51305142, 51405168]
  2. Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University [Kfkt2015-11]
  3. Regional development project of Fujian Province [2016H4010]
  4. Start-up Foundation of High-talent Research Project from Huaqiao University [12BS204]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2014J01191, 2014J01189]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M552429]
  7. Project of Xiamen Science and Technology Plan [3502Z20143041]
  8. Introduction of talents Huaqiao University Scientific Research Projects [12BS217]
  9. Promotion Program for Young and Middle-aged Teachers in Science and Technology Research at Huaqiao University [ZQN-PY212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the multibody dynamics framework, the paper proposed an efficient procedure to calculate revolute joint wear of planar mechanism with low velocity. Firstly, based on the wear test data, a method to calculate the wear coefficient that corresponds to the actual working condition of the mechanism is proposed. Then, an efficient iterative prediction method for joint clearance wear evolving in the multibody dynamic system in is proposed based on the Archard's wear model. Meanwhile, the wear tests of the typical mechanism have verified the method proposed in this paper. The research shows that when the increments of the wear depth of revolute joints are not big, the method can provide high prediction accuracy; however, as the predicted wear depth increases, the prediction error increases as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据