4.6 Article

Singlet excitation in the intermediate magnetic equivalence regime and field-dependent study of singlet-triplet leakage

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 2595-2600

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8cp06883f

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [CHE-1412568, CHE-1710046]
  2. Diamond Jubilee Visiting Fellowship
  3. NSF REU grant (REU in Chemical Biology at NYU)
  4. National Science Foundation [CHE-01162222]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The examination and optimized preparation of nuclear spin singlet order has enabled the development of new types of applications that rely on potentially long-term polarization storage. Lifetimes several orders of magnitude longer than T-1 have been observed. The efficient creation of such states relies on special pulse sequences. The extreme cases of very large and very small magnetic equivalence received primary attention, while relatively little effort has been directed towards studying singlet relaxation in the intermediate regime. The intermediate case is of interest as it is relevant for many spin systems, and would also apply to heteronuclear systems in very low magnetic fields. Experimental evidence for singlet-triplet leakage in the intermediate regime is sparse. Here we describe a pulse sequence for efficiently creating singlets in the intermediate regime in a broad-band fashion. Singlet lifetimes are studied with a specially synthesized molecule over a wide range of magnetic fields using a home-built sample-lift apparatus. The experimental results are supplemented with spin simulations using parameters obtained from ab initio calculations. This work indicates that the chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) mechanism is relatively weak compared to singlet-triplet leakage for the proton system observed over a large magnetic field range. These experiments provide a mechanism for expanding the scope of singlet NMR to a larger class of molecules, and provide new insights into singlet lifetime limiting factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据