4.5 Article

Soil Microbes Compete Strongly with Plants for Soil Inorganic and Amino Acid Nitrogen in a Semiarid Grassland Exposed to Elevated CO2 and Warming

期刊

ECOSYSTEMS
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 867-880

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-015-9868-7

关键词

amino acids; global change; grasslands; nitrogen uptake; C-13; N-15

类别

资金

  1. US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Climate Change, Soils & Emissions Program
  2. USDA-CSREES Soil Processes Program [2008-35107-18655]
  3. US Department of Energy Office of Science (BER) [DE-SC0006973]
  4. Western Regional Center of the National Institute for Climatic Change Research
  5. National Science Foundation (DEB) [1021559]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0006973] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Free amino acids (FAAs) in soil are an important N source for plants, and abundances are predicted to shift under altered atmospheric conditions such as elevated CO2. Composition, plant uptake capacity, and plant and microbial use of FAAs relative to inorganic N forms were investigated in a temperate semiarid grassland exposed to experimental warming and free-air CO2 enrichment. FAA uptake by two dominant grassland plants, Bouteloua gracilis and Artemesia frigida, was determined in hydroponic culture. B. gracilis and microbial N preferences were then investigated in experimental field plots using isotopically labeled FAA and inorganic N sources. Alanine and phenylalanine concentrations were the highest in the field, and B. gracilis and A. frigida rapidly consumed these FAAs in hydroponic experiments. However, B. gracilis assimilated little isotopically labeled alanine, ammonium and nitrate in the field. Rather, soil microbes immobilized the majority of all three N forms. Elevated CO2 and warming did not affect plant or microbial uptake. FAAs are not direct sources of N for B. gracilis, and soil microbes outcompete this grass for organic and inorganic N when N is at peak demand within temperate semiarid grasslands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据