3.8 Article

Utility of plasma exchange in early recurrent C3 glomerulopathy

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 122-126

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/ijot.ijot_78_18

关键词

Anti-factor-H autoantibodies; C3 glomerulopathy; C3 nephritic factor; dense deposit disease; plasma exchange

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Treatment options for recurrent C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) are not explored in large trials. Only Eculizumab has been successfully used to improve the renal function in patients with recurrent C3G. In the current report, we are sharing our experience with plasma exchange (PLEX) in the management of early recurrent C3G post-renal transplantation. Materials and Methods: A total of four patients underwent PLEX. Time to recur was less than two weeks in all the patients. Serology levels, autoantibody testing and limited genetic workup was done in all the four patients. The clinical details of patients were recorded. Results: All the patients underwent 5 PLEX (40 ml/kg/session) with fresh frozen plasma as the replacement. The median time for post-transplant recurrence was 3-days. Immediate reduction in serum creatinine was seen in three (75%) patients. After a median last follow-up of 8.5 (range: 4-18) months, two (50%) patients achieved remission and the other two (50%) had resistant disease resulting in graft loss. Three patients tested positive for autoantibodies (two cases had positive C3-nephritic factor and one had anti-complement factor-H autoantibodies. Complement factor H gene analysis revealed rs1061170; p.His402Tyr (missense variant), rs1061147; p.Ala307= (synonymous variant) and rs2274700; p.Ala473= (synonymous variant) in three cases. All the three patients who had immediate response to PLEX had positive autoantibodies against complement pathway regulators. Conclusion: In the present report, we performed extensive workup for complement pathway abnormality and found that patients with recurrent C3G following transplantation having autoantibodies benefited with PLEX.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据